From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polansky v. N.H. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Mar 27, 2013
Civil No. 12-cv-105-PB (D.N.H. Mar. 27, 2013)

Summary

holding that prisoner's preference for one procedure did not render a second an unreasonable accommodation so long as it granted prisoner access to services

Summary of this case from Knox v. Mass. Dep't of Corr.

Opinion

Civil No. 12-cv-105-PB

03-27-2013

Christopher Polansky v. NH Department of Corrections, et al


ORDER

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty, is designated to review the request for injunctive relief submitted by Plaintiff Christopher Polansky and, if necessary, conduct any hearing that may be set.

In accordance with subparagraph (C), the Magistrate Judge shall file her proposed findings and recommendations under subparagraph (B) with the Court, and a copy shall forthwith be mailed to all parties.

SO ORDERED.

______________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge
cc: Christopher Polansky, Pro se

Lynmarie Cusack, Esq.

Jonathan Lax, Esq.


Summaries of

Polansky v. N.H. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Mar 27, 2013
Civil No. 12-cv-105-PB (D.N.H. Mar. 27, 2013)

holding that prisoner's preference for one procedure did not render a second an unreasonable accommodation so long as it granted prisoner access to services

Summary of this case from Knox v. Mass. Dep't of Corr.
Case details for

Polansky v. N.H. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Polansky v. NH Department of Corrections, et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 12-cv-105-PB (D.N.H. Mar. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Knox v. Mass. Dep't of Corr.

This was Knox's choice, and as such, cannot be grounds for an ADA violation on part of the DOC. See Polansky…