In Place v. Hayward (100 N.Y. 626) it is said: "Whether a court shall modify or change an order already made by it is a question addressed to its discretion, and over its exercise an appellant court has no control."
Summary of this case from Wadsley v. HouckArgued October 20, 1885
Decided October 30, 1885
J K. Hayward, appellant, in person. Charles F. Wells for respondent.
DANFORTH, J., reads for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
In Place v. Hayward (100 N.Y. 626) it is said: "Whether a court shall modify or change an order already made by it is a question addressed to its discretion, and over its exercise an appellant court has no control."
Summary of this case from Wadsley v. HouckFull title:BARKER PLACE, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v . JEDEDIAH K. HAYWARD…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 30, 1885
Such an application is ordinarily addressed to the discretion of the judge. In Place v. Hayward ( 100 N.Y.…
Tuska v. JarvisThe plaintiff appeals from two orders herein, one of May 18, 1908, opening, vacating and setting aside,…