From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piontek v. Penn Security Bank Trust Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 18, 2011
No. 3:10-CV-1038 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:10-CV-1038.

March 18, 2011


ORDER


NOW this 18th day of March, 2011, upon review of the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge William T. Prince (Doc. No. 17) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The report and recommendation (Doc. No. 17) is ADOPTED.
(2) The defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED. The clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.
(3) The clerk of court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.


Summaries of

Piontek v. Penn Security Bank Trust Company

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 18, 2011
No. 3:10-CV-1038 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Piontek v. Penn Security Bank Trust Company

Case Details

Full title:VICKI PIONTEK, PLAINTIFF, v. PENN SECURITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 18, 2011

Citations

No. 3:10-CV-1038 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 18, 2011)

Citing Cases

Riviello v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union

Plaintiff's Complaint and opposing papers fail to address these affirmative defenses; accordingly,…

Hughes v. Kore of Ind. Enter., Inc.

Drager's interpretation of the safe-harbor provision is the prevailing view of district courts that have…