finding that sixteen-year-old information concerning sexual abuse and possession of child pornography was not stale because "[t]he issuing judge was entitled to conclude from the affidavit that a person charged with sexual abuse and exploitation of children would be likely to retain pornographic material and lewd photographs indefinitely"
Summary of this case from State v. ForanDenied August 28, 2003
finding that sixteen-year-old information concerning sexual abuse and possession of child pornography was not stale because "[t]he issuing judge was entitled to conclude from the affidavit that a person charged with sexual abuse and exploitation of children would be likely to retain pornographic material and lewd photographs indefinitely"
Summary of this case from State v. ForanFull title:PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date published: Aug 28, 2003
These courts have repeatedly rejected staleness challenges to search warrants, even when the information…
State v. CabralBut, staleness "is not a rigid concept." Behrel v. State, 151 Md.App. 64, 88, 823 A.2d 696, cert. denied, 376…