holding that, because the curfew statute authorized officers to take minors into custody for violating it, the statute provided authority to stop a minor whom an officer reasonably suspected to be in violation of the curfew
Summary of this case from State v. ChambersJune 22, 1982.
holding that, because the curfew statute authorized officers to take minors into custody for violating it, the statute provided authority to stop a minor whom an officer reasonably suspected to be in violation of the curfew
Summary of this case from State v. Chambersrequiring cross-petition to obtain more favorable judgment on review by Court of Appeals
Summary of this case from Miller v. SaifFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jun 22, 1982
"(c) The peace officer has probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has violated the terms of…
Valley Siletz Railroad v. LaudahlArgued and submitted November 20, 1981Reversed and remanded March 22, 1982 Reconsideration denied May 27,…