affirming judgment continuing probation with modified conditions, even though asserted violation was not based on condition of probation, because, in those circumstances, the defendant "has identified no adverse consequences about which he may complain"
Summary of this case from State v. RamirezApril 7, 1998.
affirming judgment continuing probation with modified conditions, even though asserted violation was not based on condition of probation, because, in those circumstances, the defendant "has identified no adverse consequences about which he may complain"
Summary of this case from State v. Ramirezincorporating harmless error standard into prejudice inquiry of ineffective assistance of counsel claim for failure to object to shackling
Summary of this case from Barker v. Hillnoting that "LUBA does not review local findings de novo, nor is it permitted to weigh the evidence independently in conducting its substantial evidence review"
Summary of this case from Draves v. Johnsonnoting that "LUBA does not review local findings de novo, nor is it permitted to weigh the evidence independently in conducting its substantial evidence review"
Summary of this case from Hamel v. JohnsonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Apr 7, 1998
Gorham, 332 Or. at 569. In Davis v. Armenakis, 151 Or. App. 66, 72-73, 948 P.2d 327 (1997), rev den 327 Or.…
Wilbur Residents v. Douglas CountyArgued and submitted October 23, 1997 Reversed and remanded December 17, 1997 Petition for review denied…