explaining that ORS 30.866 did not differ in its material elements or in its remedies from its criminal stalking counterpart, which both "implicate the coercive use of governmental authority, including criminal sanctions, to restrain conduct involving expression"
Summary of this case from I. R. S. v. Hanington1999.
explaining that ORS 30.866 did not differ in its material elements or in its remedies from its criminal stalking counterpart, which both "implicate the coercive use of governmental authority, including criminal sanctions, to restrain conduct involving expression"
Summary of this case from I. R. S. v. HaningtonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1999
Others may not. See id. When a party relies on contacts that involve expression to obtain a stalking…
Webb v. LovetteWe therefore refer to Lovette, the appellant before us, as respondent. See Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525,…