affirming denial of suppression motion where state, by evidence of operator's observation, established prima facie case of regulatory compliance and defendant "offered no evidence that he had regurgitated"
Summary of this case from State v. Balderson1993.
affirming denial of suppression motion where state, by evidence of operator's observation, established prima facie case of regulatory compliance and defendant "offered no evidence that he had regurgitated"
Summary of this case from State v. BaldersonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
State v. McVay, 83 Or. App. 312, 731 P.2d 466 (1987). See State v. Demings, 116 Or. App. 394, 841 P.2d 660…
Zurita v. Canby NurseryArgued and submitted June 10, 1992Affirmed September 30, 1993 Reconsideration denied December 16, 1992…