Summary
reversing a conviction for telephonic harassment and remanding for entry of judgment for the lesser-included offense of attempted telephonic harassment
Summary of this case from State v. OdnorozhenkoOpinion
1998.
reversing a conviction for telephonic harassment and remanding for entry of judgment for the lesser-included offense of attempted telephonic harassment
Summary of this case from State v. Odnorozhenko1998.
reversing a conviction for telephonic harassment and remanding for entry of judgment for the lesser-included offense of attempted telephonic harassment
Summary of this case from State v. Odnorozhenkoremanding for entry of conviction for attempted telephonic harassment and resentencing where evidence did not support conviction for telephonic harassment
Summary of this case from State v. PittmanFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Whether or not a term is given its plain, ordinary meaning, we always are constrained by the reasonable…
State v. WesleyUnder Article VII (Amended), section 3, of the Oregon Constitution, we may remand for entry of a judgment of…