holding that service of an individual at an address designated by an attorney as the place where he would receive professional correspondence was reasonably calculated to notify the attorney of the pendency of the action against him
Summary of this case from Stull v. Hoke1994.
holding that service of an individual at an address designated by an attorney as the place where he would receive professional correspondence was reasonably calculated to notify the attorney of the pendency of the action against him
Summary of this case from Stull v. HokeFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
Moreover, the personal representative of a deceased person's estate is not merely the decedent by a different…
Vergara v. Patel"[T]he caption of a complaint is not dispositive," and one may look to "the allegations in the body, among…