holding that the term "necessary" expresses "non-completed legislation" that could be interpreted as "reasonably necessary" rather than "indispensable"
Summary of this case from Friends of Yamhill County v. City of NewbergJune 21, 1983.
holding that the term "necessary" expresses "non-completed legislation" that could be interpreted as "reasonably necessary" rather than "indispensable"
Summary of this case from Friends of Yamhill County v. City of NewbergFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jun 21, 1983
The second line holds that damages are not ascertainable where there are conflicting claims regarding the…
1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtThe dismissal was appealed to this court, and we concluded that "the County's decision to authorize an…