holding that the legislature's amendment of statutory provision that had been held to be impliedly repealed "has the effect of reviving and reenacting" the provision that had been impliedly repealed

holding that a briefcase and a coin purse are "typically used to store valuables" because, "when viewed objectively, [they] are containers in which a reasonable person could expect to find valuables"

concluding that, even if trial court's denial of suppression motion was error, the error was harmless because challenged evidence had not been introduced in defendant's trial and had not led to derivative evidence

concluding that the sellers of real property did not breach their implied duty of good faith and fair dealing by insisting that optionees under a right of first refusal comply with a provision contained in the prospective buyers' offer to purchase requiring that a residence be built on the property within a specified time period

recognizing that "ORS 163.195 was intended to cover potential risks as well as cases where a specific person is within the zone of danger," and affirming the defendant's conviction for reckless endangerment, where he shot a gun 15 times at the ceiling and front door of his lower-floor duplex in Portland at 10 p.m. on a Friday night without knowing whether anyone was upstairs or outside

describing holding in Morgan

explaining why inventory issues generally should not be considered in the first instance on appeal.