Summary
concluding that the record was sufficient to support the court's imposition of attorney fees under ORS 151.487
Summary of this case from State v. McCarthyOpinion
June 27, 2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 27, 2000
330 Or. 375 (Or. 2000)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 27, 2000
330 Or. 375 (Or. 2000)
concluding that the record was sufficient to support the court's imposition of attorney fees under ORS 151.487
Summary of this case from State v. McCarthydetermining that the plaintiff was in privity with his union for issue preclusion purposes because the union had a fiduciary duty to represent the plaintiff's interests
Summary of this case from Scherzinger v. Portland Custodians Civil Serv. Bd.explaining when issue preclusion does not apply
Summary of this case from Dinsmore v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branchinvolving a law firm that reneged on its promise of employment to a new lawyer
Summary of this case from Goldstein v. UnileverCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jun 27, 2000
Citations
330 Or. 375 (Or. 2000)
6 P.3d 1104
Citing Cases
Westwood Construction Co. v. Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc.
We therefore decline to expand Westwood Corp.'s holding beyond its rationale to the significantly different…
Vaughn v. JohnsonPER CURIAM Reversed. Bailey v. Johnson, 165 Or. App. 450, 997 P.2d 871, rev den 330 Or. 375 (2000).…