Summary
noting that "damages arising from legal malpractice claims are typically based on `purely economic loss'"
Summary of this case from Simpkins v. ConnorOpinion
December 4, 2001
noting that "damages arising from legal malpractice claims are typically based on `purely economic loss'"
Summary of this case from Simpkins v. ConnorDecember 4, 2001
noting that "damages arising from legal malpractice claims are typically based on `purely economic loss'"
Summary of this case from Simpkins v. ConnorFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Dec 4, 2001
Defendant contends that, under State v. Barrett, 331 Or. 27, 10 P.3d 901 (2000), his two convictions for…
State v. RodveltThe dissent does not dispute that the practice of our appellate courts has been to remand for merger of…