holding that the Lincoln County District Attorney did not have control of records held by police agencies in other counties and therefore could not be compelled to provide discovery of those records
Summary of this case from State v. Pilon1998.
holding that the Lincoln County District Attorney did not have control of records held by police agencies in other counties and therefore could not be compelled to provide discovery of those records
Summary of this case from State v. Pilonholding that the Lincoln County District Attorney did not have control of records held by police agencies in other counties and therefore could not be compelled to provide discovery of those records
Summary of this case from State v. Danielsholding that courts will refrain from deciding constitutional issues if there is an adequate statutory basis for a decision, "even when the parties have not raised the nonconstitutional issue on which the court ultimately bases its decision"
Summary of this case from Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Employment Departmentdiscussing the significance of what a term "means" versus what a term "includes" in definitional statutes
Summary of this case from Dep't of Human Servs. v. C. M. H. (In re S. R. R.)drawing that distinction
Summary of this case from Vigor Industrial, LLC v. Ayresinterpreting ORS 609.155, which provides for impoundment of dogs found "killing, wounding, injuring or chasing livestock"
Summary of this case from Parker v. Parkerreferring to a claim of a "tenancy interest in the property"
Summary of this case from Tualatin Valley Hou. v. Truck Ins. Exchangeapplying "compelling reason" standard of Hruby and Hruby, 304 Or. 500, 510-11, 748 P.2d 57, and holding that stepfather of adolescent daughter who had suffered "traumatic loss" from her mother's death overcame presumption in favor of biological father, because removing the child from stepfather's home would have caused her "undue psychological harm" despite the biological father's fitness
Summary of this case from Wurtele v. Blevinsapplying Hruby; stepfather of adolescent daughter who has suffered `traumatic loss' overcame parental presumption because removing her from stepfather's house would cause `undue psychological harm' despite natural parent's fitness
Summary of this case from Strome and Stromeapplying OEC 308 to the presumption in ORS 609.157 that a dog found chasing livestock where freshly damaged livestock is found is presumed to have caused the damage
Summary of this case from STATE v. DAHLapplying Hruby; stepfather of adolescent daughter who has suffered "traumatic loss" overcame parental presumption because removing her from stepfather's house would cause "undue psychological harm" despite natural parent's fitness
Summary of this case from State v. Woodenapplying OEC 308 to presumption in ORS 609.157 that a dog found chasing livestock where freshly damaged livestock is found is presumed to have caused the damage
Summary of this case from Lawrence v. Clackamas Countyconstruing ORS 164.395, which prohibits robbery in the third degree
Summary of this case from Hanzo v. deParrieFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Id. at 168. Similarly, our application of the Hruby standard in Fenimore v. Smith, 145 Or. App. 501, 930 P.2d…
Wurtele v. BlevinsIn sum, here, unlike in Wooden, a transitional period cannot adequately address the parties' circumstances…