Summary
holding that PCR relief "is available only as to claims that actually have been alleged in the petition or amended petition"
Summary of this case from Gonzalez-Aguilera v. NoothOpinion
August 15, 2000
holding that PCR relief "is available only as to claims that actually have been alleged in the petition or amended petition"
Summary of this case from Gonzalez-Aguilera v. NoothAugust 15, 2000
holding that PCR relief "is available only as to claims that actually have been alleged in the petition or amended petition"
Summary of this case from Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Noothconcluding that "the state's use of the conjunctive in its indictment *** did not mean that it was required to prove in the conjunctive"
Summary of this case from State v. Amador-Hernandezdescribing the standard under ORCP 47 C
Summary of this case from Gillette v. CainFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Aug 15, 2000
Rather, petitioner raised them in a supplemental pro se document which did not properly put the issues before…
Walton v. HillOn appeal from the denial of PCR relief, Petitioner attempted to raise these claims in his Pro Se…