rejecting argument that trial court plainly erred in failing to give a limiting instruction regarding "other crimes" evidence, in part because "some defense counsel do not want them, because they call the jury's attention to other bad acts or convictions"
Summary of this case from Delgado-Juarez v. Cain1994.
rejecting argument that trial court plainly erred in failing to give a limiting instruction regarding "other crimes" evidence, in part because "some defense counsel do not want them, because they call the jury's attention to other bad acts or convictions"
Summary of this case from Delgado-Juarez v. Cainproviding an example of how an election is confirmed by the court
Summary of this case from State v. Rodriguez-CastilloFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
To be effective, an election must be confirmed to the jury by the court. See, e.g., State v. Bauer, 183 Or…
State v. RandolphC901455CR, C901454CR; CA A72159 (Control), A72160 (Cases Consolidated)Argued and submitted December 4, 1992,…