holding that it could be reasonably inferred from the officer's conduct that he believed that he had probable cause to arrest the defendant even though he told the defendant that he was not arresting him when he placed the defendant in his patrol car
Summary of this case from State v. Miller1993.
holding that it could be reasonably inferred from the officer's conduct that he believed that he had probable cause to arrest the defendant even though he told the defendant that he was not arresting him when he placed the defendant in his patrol car
Summary of this case from State v. Millerconsidering subjective probable cause
Summary of this case from State v. CorningFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Petitioner filed a petition for review which the Oregon Supreme Court denied. State v. Vance, 315 Or. 644,…
Tyree v. TyreeArgued and submitted September 16, 1992Affirmed November 12, 1992 Reconsideration denied February 17, 1993…