declining to consider plaintiff’s counsel’s affidavit regarding a hearing for which there was no transcript in the record; "unilateral, after-the-fact attempts at record repair based on counsel’s recollections are unavailing"
Summary of this case from Sugiyama v. Arnold1996.
declining to consider plaintiff’s counsel’s affidavit regarding a hearing for which there was no transcript in the record; "unilateral, after-the-fact attempts at record repair based on counsel’s recollections are unavailing"
Summary of this case from Sugiyama v. Arnoldnoting that we could not determine whether the plaintiff had preserved an issue, because the record on appeal did not include a transcript of the oral arguments to the trial court
Summary of this case from State v. WellsFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
To date, we have twice undertaken that function. See State v. Aguilar, 139 Or. App. 175, 912 P.2d 379, rev…
Torbeck v. ChamberlainArgued and submitted April 3, 1995.Affirmed on appeal; reversed and remanded on cross-appeal January 3, 1996.…