Summary
concluding that when alternative bases for granting or denying a motion to suppress turn on factfinding by the trial court, the case should be remanded
Summary of this case from State v. OxfordOpinion
November 19, 2002
concluding that when alternative bases for granting or denying a motion to suppress turn on factfinding by the trial court, the case should be remanded
Summary of this case from State v. OxfordNovember 19, 2002
concluding that when alternative bases for granting or denying a motion to suppress turn on factfinding by the trial court, the case should be remanded
Summary of this case from State v. Oxfordconcluding that the crime of felony assault in the fourth degree is a distinct offense, a material element of which is the defendant's previous conviction of assaulting the same victim
Summary of this case from State v. McCoinallowing defendant to make an argument on remand that was not initially raised in the trial court
Summary of this case from State v. Klinglerstating that, where alternative bases for granting or denying a motion to suppress exist and turn on factfinding by the trial court, a case should be remanded
Summary of this case from State v. Ragibovnoting legal standard of “legitimate doubt” about liability set forth in International Paper Co. v. Huntley, 106 Or.App. 107, 110, 806 P.2d 188 (“An employer's refusal to pay is not unreasonable if it has a legitimate doubt about its liability.”)
Summary of this case from Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. v. Olvera-Chavez (In re Comp. of Olvera-Chavez)explaining that our opinions, even those that may be subject to review, control in deciding whether a penalty may be assessed against an employer for unreasonably refusing to process a workers' compensation claim
Summary of this case from State v. SweeneyFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 19, 2002
Filed: May 15, 2003. On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, State v. Jackson, 335 Or. 90, 58 P.3d 821…
State v. SweeneyWe added that "we will consider our published opinion to control the disposition of a question…