noting that the board on remand could find a PSED from a psychological report that stated, in part, that the prisoner had difficulties "control[ling] emotional discharges" and "tend[ed] to misinterpret his perceptions and to act inappropriately, in part because of excessive negativism and anger"
Summary of this case from Mendacino v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionDecember 21, 1999
noting that the board on remand could find a PSED from a psychological report that stated, in part, that the prisoner had difficulties "control[ling] emotional discharges" and "tend[ed] to misinterpret his perceptions and to act inappropriately, in part because of excessive negativism and anger"
Summary of this case from Mendacino v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervisionremanding to the parole board to reconsider its decision to defer a prisoner's release after the court concluded that the board had applied the wrong legal analysis and, as a result, made its decision based on evidence that was not relevant
Summary of this case from Lopez v. Millsallowing supplemental answer where issues raised in the answer were fully and fairly litigated and no prejudice to the other party resulted
Summary of this case from Safeport, Inc. v. Eq. Roundup Mfg., Iconsulting cases from other jurisdictions
Summary of this case from Nike v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity CompanyFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Dec 21, 1999
Thus, what follows is, in substance, a "composite" description.Compare Rennie v. Freeway Transport, 294 Or…
Washington v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionThe relevant law at the time of petitioner’s crime (May 29, 1988) was OAR 255-60-006, a 1988 version of the…