noting that G.S. § 50-20(e) also "permits a distributive award in order `to facilitate, effectuate or supplement a distribution of marital property,'" this Court observed that "[n]o North Carolina court has held that distributive awards are authorized only when a distribution in kind is impractical"
Summary of this case from Heath v. Heath1992
noting that G.S. § 50-20(e) also "permits a distributive award in order `to facilitate, effectuate or supplement a distribution of marital property,'" this Court observed that "[n]o North Carolina court has held that distributive awards are authorized only when a distribution in kind is impractical"
Summary of this case from Heath v. HeathFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Defendants have responded in kind, and we therefore likewise confine our discussion to this issue. See N.C.R.…
State v. WilsonEvidence of a defendant's other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible only if such evidence (1) is…