Finding that evidence as to all of the items was sufficient to withstand a Motion to Dismiss where currency, change, checks countersigned with the cashier's name, food stamps, coupons for hot dogs and diapers stolen from supermarket; and later currency, food stamps, check with cashier's name were found, but cashier was unable to identify the currency.
Summary of this case from State v. Carter1985
Finding that evidence as to all of the items was sufficient to withstand a Motion to Dismiss where currency, change, checks countersigned with the cashier's name, food stamps, coupons for hot dogs and diapers stolen from supermarket; and later currency, food stamps, check with cashier's name were found, but cashier was unable to identify the currency.
Summary of this case from State v. CarterFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1985
See also, State v. Rogers, 157 N.C. App. 127, 130, 577 S.E.2d 666, 669 (2003). See, e.g., State v. Farlow,…
State v. RossAllowing the defendant to testify on direct examination, rather than detracting from his credibility, may…