Summary
upholding summary judgment for defendant where plaintiffs knew of defects in glass panels more than three years before instituting suit
Summary of this case from Bonestell v. North Topsail Shores CondominiumsOpinion
1983
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1983
309 N.C. 319 (N.C. 1983)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1983
309 N.C. 319 (N.C. 1983)
upholding summary judgment for defendant where plaintiffs knew of defects in glass panels more than three years before instituting suit
Summary of this case from Bonestell v. North Topsail Shores Condominiumsstriking defendant's answer for noncompliance with discovery requests affected a substantial right and was immediately appealable
Summary of this case from Benfield v. BenfieldCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1983
Citations
309 N.C. 319 (N.C. 1983)
Citing Cases
Woody v. Vickrey
Though these exceptions are rare, our research reveals that almost all cases evaluating an interlocutory…
Williams v. Houses of Distinction, Inc.As a result, based upon a close reading of Pembee, we are unable to conclude, as the Court in Pembee did,…