Summary
holding that the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act did not bar a claim of IIED against the employer based on the allegation of sexual harassment
Summary of this case from Riley v. DeBaerOpinion
1986
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
317 N.C. 334 (N.C. 1986)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
317 N.C. 334 (N.C. 1986)
holding that the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act did not bar a claim of IIED against the employer based on the allegation of sexual harassment
Summary of this case from Riley v. DeBaerholding that sexual harassment did not arise out of the employment for a waitress because it was not a risk to which an employee is exposed because of the nature of the employment
Summary of this case from Wake County Hosp. Sys. v. Safety Nat. CasualtyCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1986
Citations
317 N.C. 334 (N.C. 1986)
Citing Cases
Phelps v. Vassey
In this case, there has been no charge that Vassey's acts were authorized by PWC. Therefore we will…
Johnson v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.While North Carolina does not have a statute making such harassment illegal, N.C.Gen.Stat. § 143-422.2…