Opinion
1989
1989
interpreting N.C.G.S. 6-19.2
Summary of this case from S.E.T.A. UNC-CH, Inc. v. HuffinesFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1989
Next, respondent contends that the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that respondent acted…
Stokes v. CrumptonSubsequent Court of Appeals cases relying on Wysocki have followed a similar analytical framework—conducting…