upholding uninsured carrier's decision to defend in its own name after first answering on behalf of the uninsured motorist, reasoning that "we find nothing in the statute which requires that its [the carrier's] decision as to which name it will defend in, once made, must be irrevocable"
Summary of this case from State ex Rel. v. Canady1974
upholding uninsured carrier's decision to defend in its own name after first answering on behalf of the uninsured motorist, reasoning that "we find nothing in the statute which requires that its [the carrier's] decision as to which name it will defend in, once made, must be irrevocable"
Summary of this case from State ex Rel. v. CanadyFull title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1974
Expressions of opinion on a question of law are not admissible into evidence. Moye v. Eure, 21 N.C. App. 261,…
State v. SharpeIn numerous North Carolina cases variant answers by jurors to the clerk's questions when polling have been…