noting trial court did not admit appellant's second statement to police at trial "at least in part because the trial court labored under the false apprehension that such a statement was inadmissible merely because it was made during a polygraph examination"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Vasquez1992
noting trial court did not admit appellant's second statement to police at trial "at least in part because the trial court labored under the false apprehension that such a statement was inadmissible merely because it was made during a polygraph examination"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. VasquezFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Id. "It is the business purpose of the record, rather than the employee status of the source, which renders…
Kiewit Eastern Co., Inc. v. L R Const. Co.Section 11 of the subcontract states: "Subcontractor's duty hereunder shall not arise if such claims, suits…