From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1994
535 Pa. 661 (Pa. 1994)

Summary

explaining Section 6503 constitutes penalty enhancing recidivist provision; defendant must be made aware of potential application of recidivist provision before entering guilty plea, pursuant to Reagan, supra; but declining to apply Reagan where defendant's sentence under Section 6503 arose following a trial conviction, not after a guilty plea

Summary of this case from Com. v. Eisaman

Opinion

1994


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1994
535 Pa. 661 (Pa. 1994)

explaining Section 6503 constitutes penalty enhancing recidivist provision; defendant must be made aware of potential application of recidivist provision before entering guilty plea, pursuant to Reagan, supra; but declining to apply Reagan where defendant's sentence under Section 6503 arose following a trial conviction, not after a guilty plea

Summary of this case from Com. v. Eisaman
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 1, 1994

Citations

535 Pa. 661 (Pa. 1994)

Citing Cases

Schroeder v. Schrader

A statute is generally applied prospectively. Sanders v.Loomis Armored, Inc., 418 Pa. Super. 375, 379, 614…

Lykins v. W.C.A.B

Vested rights are irrevocable and unalterable. Sanders v. Loomis Armored, Inc., 418 Pa. Super. 375, 614 A.2d…