Summary
holding that evidence of drug use and drug dealing were admissible to rebut defendant's claim of self-defense and to show motive
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. AguadoOpinion
1992
holding that evidence of drug use and drug dealing were admissible to rebut defendant's claim of self-defense and to show motive
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Aguado1992
holding that evidence of drug use and drug dealing were admissible to rebut defendant's claim of self-defense and to show motive
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. AguadoFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Com. v. Allison .... 10/5/92 0053 Denied No. 1088 E.D. Philadelphia 1991 (1992) Com. v. Arenella .. 4/21/92…
Commonwealth v. AguadoAs such, I conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling that the prior conviction…