Summary
applying the maxim of statutory construction " expressiounius est exclusio alterius," i.e., the mention of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of others not expressed
Summary of this case from Winkelman v. PfracpOpinion
1991
applying the maxim of statutory construction " expressiounius est exclusio alterius," i.e., the mention of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of others not expressed
Summary of this case from Winkelman v. Pfracp1991
applying the maxim of statutory construction " expressiounius est exclusio alterius," i.e., the mention of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of others not expressed
Summary of this case from Winkelman v. PfracpFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
The fact that these items have not been specifically included among the nineteen enumerated exceptions leads…
Walsh v. KubiakThus, in determining whether an expert's trial testimony falls within the fair scope of his pre-trial report,…