discussing the "state of mind" exception to the hearsay rule and also explaining why a statement which appears to be hearsay nevertheless may be admissible if offered for reasons other than proving the truth of the matter asserted
Summary of this case from In re Child M1994
discussing the "state of mind" exception to the hearsay rule and also explaining why a statement which appears to be hearsay nevertheless may be admissible if offered for reasons other than proving the truth of the matter asserted
Summary of this case from In re Child MFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
In order to reexamine the holding of Bonavitacola v. Cluver, 422 Pa. Super. 556, 619 A.2d 1363 (1993), alloc.…
Tohan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.We note that an appeal from an order denying post-trial motions is interlocutory, and, therefore,…