In Pesaty v. Hearn Son (202 N.Y.S. 264) it appears, at page 265, that "The evidence shows that, before leaving his car unattended, defendant's employee used more than ordinary care, and he cannot be held liable for the acts of trespassers occurring there-after.
Summary of this case from Landberg v. Roxy Transportation Co.February, 1924.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.
Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed.
In Pesaty v. Hearn Son (202 N.Y.S. 264) it appears, at page 265, that "The evidence shows that, before leaving his car unattended, defendant's employee used more than ordinary care, and he cannot be held liable for the acts of trespassers occurring there-after.
Summary of this case from Landberg v. Roxy Transportation Co.Full title:ISIDOR PESATY and Another, Respondents, v. JAMES A. HEARN SON, INC.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Feb 1, 1924
In Mann v. Parshall ( 229 App. Div. 366) mischievous children, or other persons had put the car in motion. In…