From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perfito v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Oct 24, 1995
665 A.2d 183 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Perfito, supra, the trial court found that there was no material issue regarding the insurance carrier's reservation of "any and all rights and defense" and that "no waiver or estoppel of any kind is intended nor should be inferred."

Summary of this case from Asvestas v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

(13699)

Argued September 27, 1995

Decision released October 24, 1995

Action to recover damages for breach of contract, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford and tried to the court, Allen, J.; judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Affirmed.

Kimball Haines Hunt, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Robyn L. Sondak, for the appellee (defendant).

Summaries of

Perfito v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Oct 24, 1995
665 A.2d 183 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)

In Perfito, supra, the trial court found that there was no material issue regarding the insurance carrier's reservation of "any and all rights and defense" and that "no waiver or estoppel of any kind is intended nor should be inferred."

Summary of this case from Asvestas v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.
Case details for

Perfito v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS PERFITO v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 24, 1995

Citations

665 A.2d 183 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995)
665 A.2d 183

Citing Cases

Asvestas v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.

On August 3, 1999, more than two years after discovering the damage, the plaintiff commenced this action. The…

1 Citing Cases