From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Corr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 5163.

May 26, 2011.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered May 12, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to plaintiff Gloria Dunn's claim under the 90/180-day category, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety.

Before: Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.


Defendants demonstrated the absence of factual issues with respect to plaintiffs 90/180-day claim, by submitting plaintiffs deposition testimony, wherein she testified that she was confined to her home for approximately one month, and that she missed about one month of work ( see McCree v Sam Trans Corp., 82 AD3d 601). That plaintiff returned to work for an additional two months, on a reduced work schedule, fails to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a 90/180-day injury ( see Linton v Nawaz, 62 AD3d 434, 443, affd on other grounds 14 NY3d 821).


Summaries of

Perez v. Corr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Perez v. Corr

Case Details

Full title:BIENVENIDA PEREZ et al., Respondents, v. JOHN A. CORR et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4369
923 N.Y.S.2d 325

Citing Cases

Tamayo v. Turman

However, defendant submitted the affirmed reports of doctors who examined plaintiff in March 2011 and found…

Panich v. Materia

Plaintiff has not submitted objective evidence that the medically-determined injury she sustained prevented…