From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
217 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 24, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the County Court's determination that there was a "definite, pronounced break" ( People v. Chapple, 38 N.Y.2d 112, 115), between the custodial interrogation by the police of the defendant which was improperly conducted without Miranda warnings, and that which was subsequently conducted at police headquarters and properly preceded by Miranda warnings. Accordingly, the County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the defendant's statements at police headquarters.

We have examined the defendant's remaining argument and find it to be without merit ( see, People v. Jones, 47 N.Y.2d 528; People v. Rhodes, 107 A.D.2d 769). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
217 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RALPH WRIGHT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 24, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 795

Citing Cases

People v. Otero

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's assertions on appeal, the Supreme Court…

People v. Johnson

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People…