Opinion
April 27, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's assertions on appeal, the Supreme Court did not err in denying his motion to suppress certain statements made by him to law enforcement authorities after he was advised of his Miranda rights (see, People v. Wright, 217 A.D.2d 675; People v. Salami, 197 A.D.2d 715; People v. Stackhouse, 160 A.D.2d 822; People v. McIntyre, 138 A.D.2d 634).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including the one raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Ritter, J.P., Sullivan, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.