From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tedesche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1957
3 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Summary

In People v Tedesche (3 A.D.2d 220) the Appellate Division of this department found that the defendant was not in "lawful custody" because the arresting officer had acted contrary to the law at that time in arresting him for a misdemeanor not committed in his presence.

Summary of this case from People v. Allah

Opinion

February 26, 1957.

Appeal from the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, EDWARD F. BRESLIN, P.J., ARTHUR DUNAIF and HILDA G. SCHWARTZ, JJ., ARTHUR DUNAIF, P.J., ROBERT U. MOLLOY and JACK L. NICHOLL, JJ.

Ira H. Holley for appellant.

William Rand, Jr., of counsel ( Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney, attorney), for respondent.


The defendant, while in the custody of a police officer who told him he was under arrest, broke away and escaped. Through the interference of a crowd, the officer was prevented from immediately reapprehending the defendant or pursuing him. The charge for which the defendant was arrested was the illegal sale of fireworks, which is a misdemeanor by virtue of section 1894-a of the Penal Law.

Absent a warrant, a police officer may only arrest a defendant charged with a misdemeanor if the crime is committed in his presence (Code Crim. Pro. § 177; People v. Cherry, 307 N.Y. 308; People v. O'Connor, 257 N.Y. 473). Later that day, the defendant surrendered at a station house. He was thereafter arraigned upon the charge. The complaint was dismissed and the defendant discharged because the officer did not witness the alleged sale of the fireworks and the only witness who purportedly saw it could not be located. The defendant was then charged with escape from lawful custody (Penal Law, § 1694) and, after trial was convicted. There having been no legal arrest, the defendant was not in "lawful custody" within the meaning of the Penal Law, and his escape was not from the custody contemplated by section 1694. The judgment of conviction should therefore be reversed and the information dismissed.

BOTEIN, J.P., RABIN, FRANK, VALENTE and McNALLY, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and the information dismissed. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

People v. Tedesche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1957
3 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

In People v Tedesche (3 A.D.2d 220) the Appellate Division of this department found that the defendant was not in "lawful custody" because the arresting officer had acted contrary to the law at that time in arresting him for a misdemeanor not committed in his presence.

Summary of this case from People v. Allah

In People v. Tedesche (3 A.D.2d 220) the court reversed the conviction and dismissed the information, the facts being as follows: Defendant, arrested on a charge of illegal sale of fireworks, a misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 1894-a), broke away and escaped.

Summary of this case from People v. Tinston
Case details for

People v. Tedesche

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH TEDESCHE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1957

Citations

3 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
159 N.Y.S.2d 486

Citing Cases

State v. Schlothauer

The primary question presented is whether the defendant was lawfully arrested at the time of his escape. It…

State v. Dickson

An essential element of the offense, which the State was required to prove, was that the defendant was in…