From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spurgeon [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
695 N.Y.S.2d 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued May 27, 1999

August 2, 1999

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Steven R. Bernhard of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicole Beder, and Daniel Chu of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, DANIEL W. JOY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), rendered January 21, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in permitting the People to introduce the defendant's Grand Jury testimony into evidence on their rebuttal case. We disagree. In light of the inconsistencies between the defendant's Grand Jury testimony and the account furnished by his alibi witnesses at trial, the defendant's Grand Jury testimony was properly introduced as an admission ( see, People v. Rodriguez, 191 A.D.2d 597; People v. Koestler, 176 A.D.2d 1207).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, JOY, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Spurgeon [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
695 N.Y.S.2d 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Spurgeon [2d Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. TASHON SPURGEON, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 2, 1999

Citations

695 N.Y.S.2d 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)