From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 1993
191 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 15, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree arising from an incident which occurred on September 4, 1990, when the defendant and another forcibly stole $800 from the complainant at the intersection of Broadway and Stockdon Street in Brooklyn. Three days later, the complainant spotted the defendant on the street and contacted the police. Shortly thereafter, the complainant positively identified the defendant to the police and the defendant was arrested.

The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court allowed the prosecution to introduce the defendant's Grand Jury testimony as part of the case-in-chief. However, the defendant did not object to the admission of his Grand Jury testimony at trial, and thus the claimed evidentiary error is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Donovan, 59 N.Y.2d 834). In any event, the Grand Jury testimony was properly admitted as an admission by the defendant (see, People v. Koestler, 176 A.D.2d 1207).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 1993
191 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 73

Citing Cases

People v. Spurgeon [2d Dept 1999

We disagree. In light of the inconsistencies between the defendant's Grand Jury testimony and the account…

People v. Spurgeon

We disagree. In light of the inconsistencies between the defendant's Grand Jury testimony and the account…