From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sorenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1996
225 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 4, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his sentence, which was to run consecutively to the sentences previously imposed upon the defendant's convictions in an unrelated manslaughter case ( People v Sorenson, 225 A.D.2d 566 [decided herewith]) was not excessive ( see, Penal Law § 70.25; People v Rivera, 131 A.D.2d 892). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sorenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1996
225 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Sorenson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EMIL SORENSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 726

Citing Cases

People v. Karimzada

Assuming that the People were required to sustain such a burden, we find that they proved, beyond a…