From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1987
131 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

June 29, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After reviewing the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing, and viewing the videotape of the lineup from which the complainant identified the defendant, we concur in the hearing court's determination that the lineup was in all respects fair (see, People v Logan, 25 N.Y.2d 184, cert denied 396 U.S. 1020, rearg dismissed 27 N.Y.2d 733, 737; cf., People v Burwell, 26 N.Y.2d 331).

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that the sentence in the instant case was to run consecutively to the sentences the defendant was still serving at the time this judgment was rendered (see, Penal Law § 70.25).

The remaining contentions raised by the defendant have not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05), and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1987
131 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY RIVERA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1987

Citations

131 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Sorenson

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, his sentence, which was to run…

People v. Karimzada

Assuming that the People were required to sustain such a burden, we find that they proved, beyond a…