From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Slejska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 1993
197 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Summary

In Slejska, the trial court granted defense counsel's motion for a CPL article 730 examination of his client in the middle of trial.

Summary of this case from People v. Williams

Opinion

October 14, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.).


Defendant has the right to be present at any material stage of the trial, but inasmuch as no hearing was conducted on defense counsel's unopposed motion to confirm the respondent's finding defendant unfit to proceed, counsel's presence, alone, was sufficient.

We find no support in the record for defendant's claim on appeal that had he been present, he might have opposed his counsel's motion to confirm the reports. It thus follows that the court properly discharged the jury and that defendant's subsequent plea of guilty did not violate his right not to be twice placed in jeopardy for the same offense.

Under the circumstances herein, where the defendant pleaded guilty to a heinous crime, we do not find the negotiated sentence to be excessive.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Slejska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 1993
197 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

In Slejska, the trial court granted defense counsel's motion for a CPL article 730 examination of his client in the middle of trial.

Summary of this case from People v. Williams
Case details for

People v. Slejska

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIROSLAV SLEJSKA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 30

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

His presence would not, therefore, have been "`useless, or the benefit but a shadow'" (People v. Velasco,…

People v. Kimes

( People v Williams, 85 NY2d at 947, quoting People v Morales, 80 NY2d 450, 456.) However, a defendant does…