recognizing that under Michigan law, "the obligation to pay alimony does not terminate by operation of law upon the death of the payor; it may be enforced against the payor's estate"

Summary of this case from Schwartz v. Oltarz-Schwartz

See 3 Summaries

Opinion

Docket No. 142751.COA No. 298138.

2011-12-2

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Richard Kenneth PULLEN, Defendant–Appellee.

Order

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellee for extension to July 15, 2011 of the time for filing his brief is considered and it is granted.

Summaries of

People v. Pullen

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Dec 2, 2011

805 N.W.2d 453 (Mich. 2011)

recognizing that under Michigan law, "the obligation to pay alimony does not terminate by operation of law upon the death of the payor; it may be enforced against the payor's estate"

Summary of this case from Schwartz v. Oltarz-Schwartz

defining "palpable" as obvious and readily visible

Summary of this case from O'Dovero v. McCauley (In re Peter & Lois O'Dovero Irrevocable Tr.)

reviewing a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion

Summary of this case from Mattichak v. Mclaren Med. Grp.

Case details for