From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pilat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1970
35 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Summary

In People v Pilat (35 A.D.2d 968, affd 29 N.Y.2d 777), we held that proof of the statutory criterion was a sine qua non for conviction. The conviction therein of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree was reduced to one of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree.

Summary of this case from People v. Delancy

Opinion

December 14, 1970


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 5, 1970, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to the State Department of Correction for a maximum term of three years. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the conviction to criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and case remanded to the trial court for resentence. In our opinion the evidence was legally insufficient to establish defendant's guilt of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree. There was no proof that at the time of the commission of the crime the value of the vehicle exceeded $250 (Penal Law, § 165.45). However, in our opinion, the proof adduced at trial was sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law, § 165.40). The judgment should accordingly be modified by reducing the conviction to criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and the case remanded for resentence (Code Crim. Pro., § 543, subd. 2). Rabin, Acting P.J., Munder, Martuscello, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pilat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1970
35 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

In People v Pilat (35 A.D.2d 968, affd 29 N.Y.2d 777), we held that proof of the statutory criterion was a sine qua non for conviction. The conviction therein of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree was reduced to one of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree.

Summary of this case from People v. Delancy
Case details for

People v. Pilat

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN PILAT, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1970

Citations

35 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

People v. Delancy

Defendant, when entering his plea, admitted to receiving only "five hundred bucks", his share for driving the…