From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1981
52 N.Y.2d 935 (N.Y. 1981)

Summary

In People v Parker (52 N.Y.2d 935, revg on dissenting opn below 70 A.D.2d 387, 391-394), the Court of Appeals held that, pursuant to the exemption provided by Penal Law § 265.

Summary of this case from People v. Davis

Opinion

Argued January 8, 1981

Decided February 10, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, E. LEO MILONAS, J.

Daniel J. Gotlin for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Norman Barclay and Robert M. Pitler of counsel), for respondent.


Order reversed and order of Supreme Court, New York County, dismissing the indictment reinstated for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice HAROLD BIRNS at the Appellate Division ( 70 A.D.2d 387, 391-394).

Concur: Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER. Taking no part: Chief Judge COOKE.


Summaries of

People v. Parker

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1981
52 N.Y.2d 935 (N.Y. 1981)

In People v Parker (52 N.Y.2d 935, revg on dissenting opn below 70 A.D.2d 387, 391-394), the Court of Appeals held that, pursuant to the exemption provided by Penal Law § 265.

Summary of this case from People v. Davis

In People v Parker (52 N.Y.2d 935, revg 70 A.D.2d 387 [1st Dept 1979]) and adopting dissenting opinion of Justice Birns, the defendant had a premises permit for a weapon which he took out of his home and with which he threatened to shoot his girlfriend.

Summary of this case from People v. Moore
Case details for

People v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LINCOLN PARKER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 10, 1981

Citations

52 N.Y.2d 935 (N.Y. 1981)
437 N.Y.S.2d 669
419 N.E.2d 347

Citing Cases

People v. Schumann

Justice Birns dissented, noting that the exemption statute was unequivocal and unambiguous and that the…

People v. Nance

Thus, one who possesses a valid Penal Law § 400.00 firearm permit is exempt from criminal liability imposed…