From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 8, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

The transcript of the minutes of the guilty plea proceeding does not indicate, nor can it be implied therefrom, that the defendant was told that if he was subsequently arrested or failed to appear on the date scheduled for sentencing the court could impose a harsher sentence than the one to three years imprisonment which the court promised was "[t]he worst you are looking at" in consideration of his plea of guilty. Thus, even though the defendant failed to appear for sentencing and was subsequently arrested, the sentencing court could not impose a sentence greater than that bargained for without first affording the defendant an opportunity to withdraw the plea and to stand trial (see, People v White, 144 A.D.2d 711; People v Cook, 130 A.D.2d 503). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, to afford it the opportunity to either impose the promised sentence or permit the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty. Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, O'Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Michael

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TED MICHAEL, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
593 N.Y.S.2d 292

Citing Cases

People v. Wimple

Accordingly, we vacate the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 12600/91 and remit the matter to the Supreme…

People v. Takim Newson

to which he had agreed at the time of his plea of guilty. The express condition that the defendant avoid…