From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1987
130 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 4, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the indictment.

The transcript of the minutes of the guilty plea proceeding does not indicate that the defendant was told nor can it be implied therefrom that he understood that if he failed to appear on the date scheduled for sentencing, the court could impose a harsher sentence than the 1 to 3 years' imprisonment promised to him in consideration of his guilty plea. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea should have been granted (see, People v. Annunziata, 105 A.D.2d 709; cf., People v Davis, 106 A.D.2d 657; People v. Gamble, 111 A.D.2d 869; People v Adams, 131 Misc.2d 308). Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1987
130 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY COOK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. White

The transcript of the minutes of the proceedings at which the defendant entered his guilty pleas do not…

People v. Ruiz

The transcript of the minutes of the proceedings at which the defendant entered his plea of guilty does not…