From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McBurrows

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 16, 2018
911 N.W.2d 197 (Mich. 2018)

Opinion

SC: 157200 COA: 338552

05-16-2018

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Romon Berry MCBURROWS, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether Monroe County is a proper venue for the charge of delivery of a controlled substance causing death, MCL 750.317a. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

People v. McBurrows

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 16, 2018
911 N.W.2d 197 (Mich. 2018)
Case details for

People v. McBurrows

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROMON BERRY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 16, 2018

Citations

911 N.W.2d 197 (Mich. 2018)

Citing Cases

People v. Pikes

The application for leave to appeal is currently being considered, and the Court has ordered oral argument on…

People v. Muller

Initially, the motion to withdraw was held in abeyance because our Supreme Court granted leave to appeal this…