From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martinez

Criminal Court of the City of New York. NY County
Oct 28, 2011
33 Misc. 3d 1216 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 2011)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In People v. Martinez, 33 Misc.3d 1216(A) (Crim Ct, N.Y. County 2011), Judge Tamiko Amaker was also confronted with an accusatory instrument that did not establish how long after the startling event the declaration was uttered.

Summary of this case from People v. Varner
See 1 Summary

Opinion

October 28, 2011.

Amaker, J.

Crimes-Assault — Facial Sufficiency of Information — Complainant's statement deemed excited utterance at pleading stage, and thus, accusatory instrument is facially sufficient information.

Summaries of

People v. Martinez

Criminal Court of the City of New York. NY County
Oct 28, 2011
33 Misc. 3d 1216 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 2011)

In People v. Martinez, 33 Misc.3d 1216(A) (Crim Ct, N.Y. County 2011), Judge Tamiko Amaker was also confronted with an accusatory instrument that did not establish how long after the startling event the declaration was uttered.

Summary of this case from People v. Varner
Case details for

People v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:People v. Martinez (Adrian)

Court:Criminal Court of the City of New York. NY County

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

33 Misc. 3d 1216 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51952

Citing Cases

People v. Varner

This court respectfully declines to follow Schuler 's holding, which the Court notes, has not be followed or…

1 Citing Cases